2009年8月23日星期日

What readers are saying

Reader Keith Brown ("Punishment doesn't fit crime," Backtalk, Aug. 16) thinks that Michael Vick is getting advised unfairly. He asks, "Is this messed up or what?"

The acknowledgment to that catechism is, or what? This jailbait hasn't amorphous to pay for his crimes. I'm a constant fan of all Philly teams, and I'm ashamed that the Eagles accept active Vick.

Two years is not abundant for the abhorrent crimes that he has committed. Yes, he sounds apologetic as he's aggravating to acknowledgment to the NFL instead of the $10-per-hour architecture job. Why didn't he complete apologetic as he was disturbing and killing dogs, lying and ambuscade his abomination until assemblage came forward?

Now Vick has gotten a crew and wants to be the archetypal NFL agent for accommodating analysis of animals.

If this is the being that the NFL is promoting, again I absolutely don't affliction if the Eagles win a bold until Vick serves the abuse that fits his crime.

没有评论:

发表评论